1 Effective radius reported by Lamy and collaborators in one or more of the  
   following sources: Lamy and Toth (1995), Lamy et al. (1996), (1998a),      
   (1998b), (1999a), (1999b), (2000), (2001a), (2001b), (2002), (2003),       
   Groussin et al. (2003), (2004), Toth et al. (2003).                        
                                                                              
 2 Effective radius reported by Lowry and collaborators in one of the         
   following sources: Lowry et al. (1999), (2003a), (2003b), Lowry and        
   Fitzsimmons (2001), Lowry and Weissman (2003).                             
                                                                              
 3 Effective radius reported by Licandro et al. (2000).                       
                                                                              
 4 Effective radius reported by Meech et al. (2004).                          
                                                                              
 5 Effective radius reported by Scotti (unpublished data, 1995).              
                                                                              
 6 An effective radius reported by some other source.  See Lamy et al. (2004) 
   for details.                                                               
                                                                              
 7 Best estimate of effective radius from a variety of sources analyzed in    
   Tancredi et al. (2000).                                                    
                                                                              
 8 Tancredi presented an updated version of the catalog of                    
   Tancredi et al. (2000) at the 'Asteroids, Comets, Meteors' 2002 conference,
   which included some recalculated determinations of effective radius.       
                                                                              
 9 The 'most reliable' value of r(n,v), as determined by Lamy et al. (2004).  
                                                                              
10 Reported value refers to fragment C.  Effective radius reported by Lamy and
   collaborators in one or more of the following sources:                     
   Lamy and Toth (1995), Lamy et al. (1996), (1998a), (1998b), (1999a),       
   (1999b), (2000), (2001a), (2001b), (2002), (2003), Groussin et al. (2003), 
   (2004), Toth et al. (2003).                                                
                                                                              
11 Nucleus size measurements were made prior to breakup.  An effective radius 
   reported by some other source.  See Lamy et al. (2004) for details.        
                                                                              
12 Nucleus size measurements were made prior to breakup.  The 'most reliable' 
   value of r(n,v), as determined by Lamy et al. (2004).                      
                                                                              
13 Reported value refers to fragment C.  The 'most reliable' value of r(n,v), 
   as determined by Lamy et al. (2004).                                       
                                                                              
14 Adopted albedo of 0.047.                                                   
                                                                              
15 Assumed albedo of 0.047 and a phase coefficient of 0.06 mag/deg.           
                                                                              
16 A spherical nuclei with a geometric albedo of 0.04 for the R band and a    
   phase law of 0.04 mag/deg was assumed to get the measurement.              
                                                                              
17 Assumed albedo of 0.04 and phase coefficient of 0.035 mag per deg.         
                                                                              
18 A spherical nuclei with a geometric albedo of 0.024 for the R band as      
   independently measured and a phase law of 0.04 mag/deg was assumed to get  
   the measurement.                                                           
                                                                              
19 Assumed albedo of 4% and a phase coefficient of 0.035 mag per deg.         
                                                                              
20 The uncertainty is about 3 times greater than the formal errors from the   
   fit, to account for systematic and model uncertainties.                    
                                                                              
21 Assumed albedo of 0.04 for the R band and a linear phase law with a        
   coefficient of 0.04 mag/deg.                                               
                                                                              
22 Assumed albedo of 0.04.                                                    
                                                                              
23 Assumed 4% albedo but estimated ~6% albedo.                                
                                                                              
24 Assumed albedo of 4% and a phase coefficient of 0.035 mag per deg. Comet   
   104P is reported with a 3-sigma upper limit.                               
                                                                              
25 Derived by using an approximate absolute magnitude of H_R~20.1+/-0.4 for an
   assumed albedo of p_R=0.04.