PDS_VERSION_ID = PDS3 RECORD_TYPE = STREAM LABEL_REVISION_NOTE = "NULL" OBJECT = INSTRUMENT INSTRUMENT_HOST_ID = "AMON" INSTRUMENT_ID = "AMVIS" OBJECT = INSTRUMENT_INFORMATION INSTRUMENT_NAME = "AMATEUR VISUAL OBSERVATIONS" INSTRUMENT_TYPE = "EYE" INSTRUMENT_DESC = " Instrument Overview =================== To better standardize the magnitude estimates, comparison star charts were mailed to observers in the Amateur Observation network. In spite of this effort, the data (documented in the FITS header) lists dozens of reference sources used by the observer. It is incumbent on any archive user to decide which sets of comparison charts are acceptable for research. The archive actually includes all those data that, based on each observer's report itself, appear to have been made in the Manual-prescribed manner. Even this approach to data inclusion still resulted in the discard of roughly one-quarter of the submitted observations. Workers interested in using experience as a selection criteria are referred to 'The Comet Halley Archive Summary Volume' (Sekanina, Z., 1991) article about the Amateur Observation network. The table below (from Appendix A) is based on those whose data appear in the International Comet Quarterly files and includes both the most active ICQ observers of P/Halley and the most active observers of all comets in the ICQ archives. Active ICQ Observers of All Comets discussed by Morris and Green (1987) Observer Number of Number of Positive Observations Negative Observations John E. Bortle 1,952 74 Charles Morris 1,799 36 Reinder Bouma 914 8 Daniel W.E. Green 863 3 David Seargent 618 1 Richard Keen 607 0 Scientific Objectives ===================== Amateur observations of periodic Comet Halley commenced with the visual recovery of the comet by S. J. O'Meara on 1985 January 23. They ended with D. H. Levy's observation on 1988 February 23. Within that period 11641 magnitudes and other related visual estimates were made. 2170 photographs span 1985 August 12 to 1988 February 16. Observations from 637 amateur astronomers were used in the archive. The observations, compiled by the Discipline Specialist Team, can be grouped into two distinct categories: (1) Visual-appearance descriptions. (2) Photographs. Because of the subjective nature of visual-appearance observation methods there is diversity in the type and quality of information recorded in the archive. When a range of values was given by the observer the more conservative value was adopted, i.e. a shorter tail, more diffuse condensation, smaller coma, and fainter magnitude. All the photographic images listed are on file and were examined for quality before inclusion in the archive listings." END_OBJECT = INSTRUMENT_INFORMATION OBJECT = INSTRUMENT_REFERENCE_INFO REFERENCE_KEY_ID = "JPL D-400-450" END_OBJECT = INSTRUMENT_REFERENCE_INFO OBJECT = INSTRUMENT_REFERENCE_INFO REFERENCE_KEY_ID = "MORRIS&GREEN1987" END_OBJECT = INSTRUMENT_REFERENCE_INFO END_OBJECT = INSTRUMENT END