===============================================================================
EPOXI, 29 Mar 2013, SAM:
  Resolved the following liens the following dataset(s) that were peer reviewed 
  by SBN on 05 Mar 2013.  My comments regarding the completion of each lien 
  start with the string ">> SAM:".
===============================================================================
 
 
PDS/SBN Comet Data Review
Typos/Corrections from Matthew Knight
March 3, 2013
 
 
DIF-C-MRI-5-EPOXI-HARTLEY2-PHOTOM-V1.0 (& other DI* datasets for this review)
====================================== 
catalog/dif.cat
-Clock correlation section: The texts states that as of early 2009 there
 was a plan to have clock corrections. Are these available yet? If so, 
 the text should be updated.
 >> SAM:  No, the clock corrections will most likely be done in 2013.
          Brian C. and Tony F. are still on the hook for this task.  However,
          I did add this expected completion date to the clock correlation
          discussion in dif.cat and dii.cat.

catalog/epoxi.cat
-Mission timeline: the following were listed under DIXI/Hartley 2:  but 
 I didn't see them in the body of the document: "HRII Spectrometer 
 Cooldown", "Flyby and Closest Approach".
 >> SAM:  Done.
-The last paragraph under "Recommended Reading > EPOXI" is slightly
 different in different copies of epoxi.cat in different datasets. This
 seems to be the only difference.
 >> SAM:  Made sure latest version of epoxi.cat is copied to this dataset.
-Under "Mission Data", should those datasets already archived by PDS have 
 the full PDS reference given?
 >> SAM:  No. The PDS search engine allows a user to find all datasets
          belonging to the EPOXI mission, and the EPOXI mission page at the
          SBN website lists all datasets.  No need to put references in
          epoxi.cat. 
-Under "Mission objectives": should the tenses here be past?
 >> SAM:  Done.
 
catalog/mri.cat
-"Instrument Overview", "The filter wheel..." paragraph: Consider giving
 a reference for the Hale-Bopp filter sets (e.g. Farnham et al., 2000)
 >> SAM:  Done.  And added FARNHAMETAL2000 to ref_epoxi.cat

catalog/ref.cat
-Under "EPOXI General": both BODEWITSETAL2013 and KLAASENETAL2011 say 
 they have been submitted to Icarus. Do they have references? I cannot 
 find the Bodewits one on ADS, and the most promising one for Klaasen is
 titled "Stardust-NExT NAVCAM calibration and performance"  
 (http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013Icar..222..436K) with a different 
 author list. If so, shouldn't it be KLAASENETAL2013? [NOTE: this appears
 in multiple datsets so please crosscheck]
 >> SAM:  The IDs BODEWITSETAL2013 and KLAASENETAL2011 are referenced in other
          catalog files for the EPOXI archive, such as dataset.cat.  These
          papers have been submitted but are not yet published.  Therefore I did
          not change the publication dates.  However the IDs BODEWITSETAL2013
          and KLAASENETAL2011 have already been used in datasets archived in the
          PDS, so we should continue to use them. 
-Under "DIXI Journal Publications", I think LIVENGOODETAL2009 should
 be LIVENGOODETAL2011 for the paper "Properties of an Earth-Like Planet 
 Orbiting a Sun-Like Star: Earth Observed by the EPOXI Mission"
 (http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AsBio..11..907L) [NOTE: this appears
 in multiple datsets so please crosscheck]
 >> SAM:  Yes, Tim did get that paper published in Astrobiology in 2011!
          I updated LIVENGOODETAL2009 to reflect that new information. However
          LIVENGOODETAL2009 has already been used in datasets archived in the
          PDS, so we should continue to it.
 
 
DIF-C-MRI-5-EPOXI-HARTLEY2-PHOTOM-V1.0 (only) 
======================================
document/hartley2-photometry_report.pdf
-It would be useful if this document had page numbers
-p.2, line 2: "Klaasen, et012" -> "Klaasen, et al., 2012"
-p.2, line 16: Belton et  al. 2012 should be 2011
-p.5, line 1: "process in" -> "process is"
-p.6, line 1: "result images" -> "resulting images"
-p.8, line 1: "method use" -> "method we used"
-p.8, line 5: "output save" -> pick one of these two
 >> SAM:  Above 7 items done.
-p.10: Do Bodewits et al. 2013 and Klaasen et al. 2012 have full references
 yet?
 >> SAM:  Klaasen et al. 2012 was accepted for publication in 2013; changed pub 
          date to 2013. Bodewits et al. 2013 is expected to be published later 
          in 2013.

document/hartley2_mri_anomaly.pdf
-p.6, paragraph 2, line 5: "up by the" -> "up by"
 >> SAM:  DONE.
 
 
The end.