TMPL1PHOT (aka DISA_IRASPH)
========= 
The AO resolution question noted for DISA_0001 has a critical bearing on
this data set.  These data cannot be accepted until that answer is known
and the impact on this data set can be determined.  If the answer is 
simple and clear, there is no need for additional review on this point.

The documentation contains a recipe for further processing.  Sykes 
questions the validity of the IRAS re-calibration procedure proposed.  The 
potentially controversial nature of the described procedure needs to be
clearly stated, at the least.  Preferably, the controversy should be 
solved and the ultimate solution documented.

In the explanatory document, amend the Figure 2 caption to indicate more
clearly that the data plotted have been further processed from the 
data obtained from Russ Walker.

Add explicit reference to the "IRAS Explanatory Supplement". (Note that
this is available as HTML on line from www.ipac.caltech.edu.

Add horizontal bars in Figure 2 showing filter FWHM.

Page 2: change reference to "fields of view of bandpasses" to "fields of
view of detectors".

Expand on the discussion of the technique used to subtract background from 
the various images.  Mark notes there might be additional survey data of 
the same area (in ISSA) without the comet in it that might be useful for
comparison.