Review Results: Accepted pending lien resolution. Certification held pending lien resolution. Liens ===== o Epoxi_sis.pdf - This is not consistent with the versions of what appear to be the same document found in the data set document/ subdirectories. o There are numerous instances of documents appearing in data set document subdirectories that should be here. This undermines the whole point of having a documentation data set. o The calibration paper needs a note added to the label that warns users that a better paper has been published and should now be used for analysis. o There are a number of completely empty sections in the calibration software directory *.asc files. This implies we should be filling them in. If that's not going to happen, these sections should be deleted. o In flight_data/epoxi/epoch, all the *geom.* files need to indicate whether coordinates are planetographic or planetocentric. All longitudes appear to be west longitudes. If the coordinates are planetocentric, these should be east longitudes. There also appear to be junk lines of code at the bottom of these files. o In several of the label files there is this sentence: "The team used these values for their analysis although corresponding parameters based on final, reconstructed pointing information are available in the archived data products are based." The last two words need to be deleted all places where this occurs. o All copies of /catalog/epoxi.cat Cruise 1, EPOCh Photometry Test: "On 4-9 November 2007, EPOCh photometry tests were performed. During these tests, the HRIV instrument observed a bright (V=9) visual binary star (HD 80607) for 12 continuous hours to check pointing and photometric stability...However the images were unexpectedly offset by 29 microradian (12.2 arcsec)." Check this conversion. I get 29 microradian = 6.0 arcsec. Which value is correct?? o c_di-c-hrii_hriv_mri_its-6-doc-set-v3.0/catalog/ref_epoxi.cat Old, e.g. dif-cal-hrii-2-epoxi-calibrations-v2.0/catalog/ref.cat is better o c_di-c-hrii_hriv_mri_its-6-doc-set-v3.0/voldesc.cat DATA_SET_ID = ..., "DIF-M-HRII-3/4-EPOXI-MARS-V1.0", ... Did PDS EN ever get this dataset? We have no record of it. Many document/*.lbl also refer to it. o epoxi_sis.pdf - Page 27, table, last row, col 2: "...-MRIV-..." should be "...-MRI..."? - Section 4.5: the massive table does not have EPOXI:MAXIMUM, EPOXI:MINIMUM, EPOXI:MEDIAN, EPOXI:STANDARD_DEVIATION, which are in examples earlier in the SIS and in labels such as dif-c-mri-3_4-epoxi-hartley2-v1.0/data/radrev/2010/248/mv10090513_4000000_0 01_rr.lbl o jd_leapsec.asc in di-c-hrii_hriv_mri_its-6-doc-set-v3.0/document/ archive_support/jd_leapsec/ * ... in some contexts *a of* one day in the integral part ... o catalog/hrii.cat catalog/hriv.cat catalog/mri.cat - Fix outdated wording (e.g., "after EPOCh..."). o catalog/epoxi.cat - Check frequency that is specified for the IR coma scans for the paragraph about departure imaging E+12 to E+21 days. o document/pdsdd_epoxi.ful document/pdsdd_epoxi.idx - Add "DEEP IMPACT/EPOXI DOCUMENT COLLECTION V3.0" VOLUME_SET_NAME in pdsdd_epoxi.ful. Then remake pdsdd_epoxi.idx. o In the column description for INSTRUMENT_MODE_ID, recommend adding a note explaining HRII DIAG mode's reset and read frames. These files are affected: di-c-hrii_hriv_mri_its-6-doc-set-v3.0/document/flight_data/epoxi/image_param_tables/ ./hartley2_obs_raw/hrii_2_epoxi_hartley2.lbl ./hartley2_obs_reduced/hrii_3_4_epoxi_hartley2.lbl ./calibrations_raw/hrii_2_epoxi_calibrations.lbl